Is social inequality meritocratic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Is amicable inequality meritocratic - Essay ExampleOne motive for the incredible perseveration of social hierarchies is that they ar reinforced by ideology, cultural viewpoints that cause and chief(prenominal)tain the interest of definite categories of pile and justify stratification. Naturally, ideology takes the structure of developing cultural patterns that are confirmed directly and indirectly in accordance with a disproportionate distribution of resources and rights to definite categories of people. Melvin M. Tumin studied social stratification and inequality and summarized useful justification is similar to sectionalisation system we act according to certain patterns or sets of ideas. Social stratification can in fact cause de motif of people, those who are deprived of their rights might also be demotivated. as well Tumin states that social stratification depends on relations of power and distribution of power in order. The main functional necessity explaining the un iversal presence of stratification is precisely the requirement faced by any society of placing and motivating individuals in the social structure. As a functioning mechanism a society must somehow distribute its members in social positions and induce them to perform the duties of these positions. It must thus cin one casern itself with motivation at two different levels to instill in the proper individuals the desire to fill certain positions, and, once in these positions, the desire to perform the duties attached to them (Tumin, 1953, socserv2.mcmaster.ca, par. 5). Social inequality systems purpose is to provide the privileged classes with the political power needed to obtain recognition and supremacy of an ideology which rationalizes the status quo, whatever it may be, as logical, natural and morally right. This way, social inequality systems are those of fundamentally conservative influences in the societies in which they are established. So Tumin states that meritocracy is bas ed on the importance of ones status and occupation.Social-conflict perspective shows that, rather than benefiting society as a whole, social stratification guarantees that some people get advantage at the expense of others. Karl Marx states that the two main social classes match to the two basic relationships people have to the resources of production. People can sustain holding or they can work for others. In industrialized class models, the capitalists (or the) manage plants, which use the manual sweat of workers (the proletariat). Work that consists mostly of manual labor is known as blue-collar work whereas work that contains middle-management mathematical function jobs is known as white-collar jobs. Marx believed that social disparity was dangerous for society. Marx gives a vivid contraposition of those two classes and suggests that social inequality is exactly meritocratic, since white-collar class is more privileged and comprises elite, which exploits proletarians, or peo ple who have no own property. The inner merit of person from higher class is that he or she was born in such family and belongs to bourgeoisie.Marxs and webers concepts are similar in many aspects, so the author decided to compare them. The idea of class and class struggle does not occupy as significant a role in Weber as in Marx. In Webers opinion, the rising speed of bureaucracy in all organizations is an unavoidable of the