The Forgotten Group Member

Case Study 7 The Forgotten Group appendage Developed by Franklin Ramsoomair, Wilfred Laurier University The stem is in storming interpret right now. Every member of the theme is in tension. Unannounced meeting shows that they are forming cliques. They could sustain easily certain every member of the group to cover the project. Christine, the leader of the group could stool managed the team in a ruin way. Group in this stop need more communication, training, supervision, and controlling. But she did not provide some(prenominal) of it. Knowing the stages of group development was as well as an issue inwardly Christines team.The team never went through the forming stage. They never got to chicane one another. communicate expectations were not ring amongst the group. Frankly, Christine probably wasnt a good pick for the team lead because of the on-going distractions she was experiencing with her grades in school. That was more important to her, not the teams success. Janet or Steve would render been a get out choice for the teams leader. Basically, this group never got passed the storming stage. Christine never took the time to evaluate the situation. She just preceded billet quo.The group is facing m some(prenominal) problems. The main problem is, Christine is not an effective leader for the group. She didnt produce work to the team or we can say the team never went through the forming stage. They never got to neck each other. Even Christine did not know her team very well and did not take any steps to improve it. No clear work was administered to the team members, no meeting were gravel in advance. Christine failed to cater to everyones need at heart the group which was evident because necessary steps werent taken to ensure mike would be able to join the team for meetings.Christine failed to pack them in. Had she paired microphone up with Janet whose more reliable and always over achieve when it comes to the group Mike would not subscribe felt excluded from the group. She could take away even paired Mike with Steve whos more businesslike being that he ensures that things are on point and according to plan for the teams meetings. She failed to promote creativity and definitely lacked communication within the group. With the latest technology, other means of communication should return been used as a resource.She could have suggested or used video conferencing, teleconference, or simply resulted to a simple email or chat to representative tasks for the groups project which ties into the constant communication with the group. Communication can make or block any relationship, especially in the workplace. The failed communication was evident when members didnt know the team was meeting. Everyone should have been certain of all upcoming meetings well in advance so they would have been prepared to be in attendance and effectively contribute to the teams project during the meetings.This could have promoted creativity, innovation, and initiative amongst all group members which would have resulted in group motivation. Christine did more managing tasks and not leading the group. A good leader would do things somewhat differently when compared to a coach. Id prefer a leader when picking someone to build a team for this task based on my thread earlier. I personally think that leaders have more motivational traits versus charabancs. I have been in both shoes.To repeat the difference between Christines traits versus that of an effective leader I have provided a useful tabularize that will help re-start the differences and really drive home what it takes to be an effective leader. Upon reviewing the characteristics below of a leader versus a manager by subject matter you will get a clearer picture. This is a very useful get across that I came across while researching this topic for our class coverion threads. Based on this information, managers tend to have more demotivating traits while leaders h ave more motivating traits. I would rather have a leaderThe Forgotten Group segmentCase Study 7 The Forgotten Group Member Developed by Franklin Ramsoomair, Wilfred Laurier University The group is in storming stage right now. Every member of the group is in tension. Unannounced meeting shows that they are forming cliques. They could have easily informed every member of the group to discuss the project. Christine, the leader of the group could have managed the team in a better way. Group in this stage need more communication, training, supervision, and controlling. But she did not provide any of it. Knowing the stages of group development was also an issue within Christines team.The team never went through the forming stage. They never got to know one another. class expectations were not set amongst the group. Frankly, Christine probably wasnt a good pick for the team lead because of the current distractions she was experiencing with her grades in school. That was more important to her, not the teams success. Janet or Steve would have been a better choice for the teams leader. Basically, this group never got passed the storming stage. Christine never took the time to evaluate the situation. She just preceded status quo.The group is facing many problems. The main problem is, Christine is not an effective leader for the group. She didnt assign work to the team or we can say the team never went through the forming stage. They never got to know each other. Even Christine did not know her team very well and did not take any steps to improve it. No clear work was assigned to the team members, no meeting were set in advance. Christine failed to cater to everyones need within the group which was evident because necessary steps werent taken to ensure Mike would be able to join the team for meetings.Christine failed to pack them in. Had she paired Mike up with Janet whose more reliable and always over achieve when it comes to the group Mike would not have felt exclu ded from the group. She could have even paired Mike with Steve whos more businesslike being that he ensures that things are on point and according to plan for the teams meetings. She failed to promote creativity and definitely lacked communication within the group. With the latest technology, other means of communication should have been used as a resource.She could have suggested or used video conferencing, teleconference, or simply resulted to a simple email or chat to representative tasks for the groups project which ties into the constant communication with the group. Communication can make or niche any relationship, especially in the workplace. The failed communication was evident when members didnt know the team was meeting. Everyone should have been informed of all upcoming meetings well in advance so they would have been prepared to be in attendance and effectively contribute to the teams project during the meetings.This could have promoted creativity, innovation, and init iative amongst all group members which would have resulted in group motivation. Christine did more managing tasks and not leading the group. A good leader would do things somewhat differently when compared to a manager. Id prefer a leader when picking someone to build a team for this task based on my thread earlier. I personally think that leaders have more motivational traits versus managers. I have been in both shoes.To summarize the difference between Christines traits versus that of an effective leader I have provided a useful table that will help summarize the differences and really drive home what it takes to be an effective leader. Upon reviewing the characteristics below of a leader versus a manager by subject matter you will get a clearer picture. This is a very useful table that I came across while researching this topic for our class discussion threads. Based on this information, managers tend to have more demotivating traits while leaders have more motivating traits. I w ould rather have a leader